ext_54545 ([identity profile] theducks.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] theducks 2006-06-21 03:47 am (UTC)

It *is* a typo/laziness. I was meaning .9 recurring for every instance of .999 (likewise .3 recurring and .6 recurring).. I'd have put a bar above it, but I have no idea how to do that with HTML :P

I could have been clearer I suppose, but c'mon, I did do TEE maths, I know that 1/3 = .3 recurring and not .3330 :)

And yes, you're right, it is a proof not a postulation.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting