theducks: (Default)
[personal profile] theducks
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/08/2210455.htm?section=wa?section=wa :

A health economist has calculated that the government should be willing to spend $15 billion a year to bridge the gap in life expectancy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.

Curtin University's Gavin Mooney has estimated the government should spend $340 billion over 22 years, based on the government's spending elsewhere in the health service.[...] He has calculated that the government spends $40,000 per person subsidising a drug that increases life expectancy by one year.


You know, I think if you just paid matching salary to each of Australia's 400,000 Aboriginals of up to $40,000 per year, you'd actually do a lot better job of increasing life expectancy than medicating them. Money for nothing is a recipe for trouble, but doubling income gained from other sources could produce some exciting results, especially if some of that money went into local community trust funds for housing and the like.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-08 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evil-megz.livejournal.com
I think I understand you...

Did you mean as if it were a drug that didn't actually DO anything (ie didn't target a specific illness or whatever) other than... give people another year... and maybe if you take it twice... DING DING ?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-04-08 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infamyanonymous.livejournal.com
Yep, that's it. Just a drug that makes your body live another year. Woo!

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 03:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios